Amatic SC vs Medula One
Medula One is about 7% narrower than Amatic SC in lowercase text, so a paragraph set in one will break lines differently in the other.
Handgloves 2026
Handgloves 2026
| Amatic SC | Medula One | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Handwriting | Display |
| Weights | Regular, Bold | Regular |
| Italics | No | No |
| Variable font | No | No |
| Average lowercase width | 315.2 | 291.8 |
| Digits | proportional | proportional |
| Character sets | 5 | 1 |
| Licence | SIL Open Font License 1.1 | SIL Open Font License 1.1 |
Weights both families offer: Regular.
Choose a PDF
or drop it here
Private and secureNo sign upNo watermarkUp to 100 MB
More about each
Questions people ask
+Is Medula One a good replacement for Amatic SC?
Medula One is about 7% narrower than Amatic SC in lowercase text, so a paragraph set in one will break lines differently in the other. Their mean width difference is 43.7 units per 1000 em (loosely similar widths).
+Which is wider, Amatic SC or Medula One?
Amatic SC is wider, by about 7% in lowercase text.
+Do both support the same languages?
Both cover Latin. Only Amatic SC has Cyrillic, Hebrew, Central European, Vietnamese.
Ready to fix your PDF?
Free, in your browser, and it takes about a minute. No account needed.