Aoboshi One vs Onest
Onest is about 2% narrower than Aoboshi One in lowercase text, so a paragraph set in one will break lines differently in the other.
Handgloves 2026
Handgloves 2026
| Aoboshi One | Onest | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Serif | Sans serif |
| Weights | Regular | Thin, ExtraLight, Light, Regular, Medium, SemiBold, Bold, ExtraBold, Black |
| Italics | No | No |
| Variable font | No | Yes |
| Average lowercase width | 537.8 | 527.4 |
| Digits | tabular | proportional |
| Character sets | 3 | 7 |
| Licence | SIL Open Font License 1.1 | SIL Open Font License 1.1 |
Weights both families offer: Regular.
Choose a PDF
or drop it here
Private and secureNo sign upNo watermarkUp to 100 MB
More about each
Questions people ask
+Is Onest a good replacement for Aoboshi One?
Onest is about 2% narrower than Aoboshi One in lowercase text, so a paragraph set in one will break lines differently in the other. Their mean width difference is 41.8 units per 1000 em (loosely similar widths).
+Which is wider, Aoboshi One or Onest?
Aoboshi One is wider, by about 2% in lowercase text.
+Do both support the same languages?
Both cover Latin, Central European. Only Aoboshi One has Japanese. Only Onest has Cyrillic, Cyrillic Extended, Math symbols, Symbols, Vietnamese.
Ready to fix your PDF?
Free, in your browser, and it takes about a minute. No account needed.