Atkinson Hyperlegible Mono vs B612 Mono
B612 Mono is about 3% wider than Atkinson Hyperlegible Mono in lowercase text, so a paragraph set in one will break lines differently in the other.
Handgloves 2026
Handgloves 2026
| Atkinson Hyperlegible Mono | B612 Mono | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Sans serif | Monospace |
| Weights | ExtraLight, Light, Regular, Medium, SemiBold, Bold, ExtraBold | Regular, Bold |
| Italics | Yes | Yes |
| Variable font | Yes | No |
| Average lowercase width | 632 | 650 |
| Digits | tabular | tabular |
| Character sets | 2 | 1 |
| Licence | SIL Open Font License 1.1 | SIL Open Font License 1.1 |
Weights both families offer: Regular, Bold.
Choose a PDF
or drop it here
Private and secureNo sign upNo watermarkUp to 100 MB
More about each
Questions people ask
+Is B612 Mono a good replacement for Atkinson Hyperlegible Mono?
B612 Mono is about 3% wider than Atkinson Hyperlegible Mono in lowercase text, so a paragraph set in one will break lines differently in the other. Their mean width difference is 18 units per 1000 em (similar widths).
+Which is wider, Atkinson Hyperlegible Mono or B612 Mono?
B612 Mono is wider, by about 3% in lowercase text.
+Do both support the same languages?
Both cover Latin. Only Atkinson Hyperlegible Mono has Central European.
Ready to fix your PDF?
Free, in your browser, and it takes about a minute. No account needed.