Bitcount Grid Single Ink vs Google Sans Code
Text set in Bitcount Grid Single Ink takes almost exactly the same space in Google Sans Code. Swapping one for the other in a document keeps the same line breaks.
| Bitcount Grid Single Ink | Google Sans Code | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Display | Monospace |
| Weights | Thin, ExtraLight, Light, Regular, Medium, SemiBold, Bold, ExtraBold, Black | Light, Regular, Medium, SemiBold, Bold, ExtraBold |
| Italics | No | Yes |
| Variable font | Yes | Yes |
| Average lowercase width | 600 | 600 |
| Digits | tabular | tabular |
| Character sets | 2 | 11 |
| Licence | SIL Open Font License 1.1 | SIL Open Font License 1.1 |
Weights both families offer: Light, Regular, Medium, SemiBold, Bold, ExtraBold.
More about each
Questions people ask
+Is Google Sans Code a good replacement for Bitcount Grid Single Ink?
Text set in Bitcount Grid Single Ink takes almost exactly the same space in Google Sans Code. Swapping one for the other in a document keeps the same line breaks. Their mean width difference is 0 units per 1000 em (identical letter widths).
+Which is wider, Bitcount Grid Single Ink or Google Sans Code?
They are the same width on average.
+Do both support the same languages?
Both cover Latin, Central European. Only Google Sans Code has Adlam, Canadian Aboriginal, Cherokee, Math symbols, Old Permic, Symbols, More symbols, Syriac, Vietnamese.
Ready to fix your PDF?
Free, in your browser, and it takes about a minute. No account needed.