Bitcount Prop Double Ink vs Recursive
Recursive is about 3% narrower than Bitcount Prop Double Ink in lowercase text, so a paragraph set in one will break lines differently in the other.
Handgloves 2026
Handgloves 2026
| Bitcount Prop Double Ink | Recursive | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Display | Sans serif |
| Weights | Thin, ExtraLight, Light, Regular, Medium, SemiBold, Bold, ExtraBold, Black | Light, Regular, Medium, SemiBold, Bold, ExtraBold, Black |
| Italics | No | No |
| Variable font | Yes | Yes |
| Average lowercase width | 580.8 | 563.5 |
| Digits | proportional | tabular |
| Character sets | 2 | 4 |
| Licence | SIL Open Font License 1.1 | SIL Open Font License 1.1 |
Weights both families offer: Light, Regular, Medium, SemiBold, Bold, ExtraBold, Black.
Choose a PDF
or drop it here
Private and secureNo sign upNo watermarkUp to 100 MB
More about each
Questions people ask
+Is Recursive a good replacement for Bitcount Prop Double Ink?
Recursive is about 3% narrower than Bitcount Prop Double Ink in lowercase text, so a paragraph set in one will break lines differently in the other. Their mean width difference is 41.1 units per 1000 em (loosely similar widths).
+Which is wider, Bitcount Prop Double Ink or Recursive?
Bitcount Prop Double Ink is wider, by about 3% in lowercase text.
+Do both support the same languages?
Both cover Latin, Central European. Only Recursive has Cyrillic Extended, Vietnamese.
Ready to fix your PDF?
Free, in your browser, and it takes about a minute. No account needed.