Buenard vs Shafarik
Shafarik is about 2% narrower than Buenard in lowercase text, so a paragraph set in one will break lines differently in the other.
Handgloves 2026
Handgloves 2026
| Buenard | Shafarik | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Serif | Display |
| Weights | Regular, Medium, SemiBold, Bold | Regular |
| Italics | No | No |
| Variable font | Yes | No |
| Average lowercase width | 467.7 | 460.4 |
| Digits | proportional | proportional |
| Character sets | 2 | 5 |
| Licence | SIL Open Font License 1.1 | SIL Open Font License 1.1 |
Weights both families offer: Regular.
Choose a PDF
or drop it here
Private and secureNo sign upNo watermarkUp to 100 MB
More about each
Questions people ask
+Is Shafarik a good replacement for Buenard?
Shafarik is about 2% narrower than Buenard in lowercase text, so a paragraph set in one will break lines differently in the other. Their mean width difference is 30.3 units per 1000 em (loosely similar widths).
+Which is wider, Buenard or Shafarik?
Buenard is wider, by about 2% in lowercase text.
+Do both support the same languages?
Both cover Latin, Central European. Only Shafarik has Cyrillic, Cyrillic Extended, Glagolitic.
Ready to fix your PDF?
Free, in your browser, and it takes about a minute. No account needed.