Cactus Classical Serif vs Source Serif 4
Source Serif 4 is about 8% wider than Cactus Classical Serif in lowercase text, so a paragraph set in one will break lines differently in the other.
Handgloves 2026
Handgloves 2026
| Cactus Classical Serif | Source Serif 4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Serif | Serif |
| Weights | Regular | ExtraLight, Light, Regular, Medium, SemiBold, Bold, ExtraBold, Black |
| Italics | No | Yes |
| Variable font | No | Yes |
| Average lowercase width | 509.3 | 550.7 |
| Digits | tabular | tabular |
| Character sets | 5 | 6 |
| Licence | SIL Open Font License 1.1 | SIL Open Font License 1.1 |
Weights both families offer: Regular.
Choose a PDF
or drop it here
Private and secureNo sign upNo watermarkUp to 100 MB
More about each
Questions people ask
+Is Source Serif 4 a good replacement for Cactus Classical Serif?
Source Serif 4 is about 8% wider than Cactus Classical Serif in lowercase text, so a paragraph set in one will break lines differently in the other. Their mean width difference is 21.9 units per 1000 em (similar widths).
+Which is wider, Cactus Classical Serif or Source Serif 4?
Source Serif 4 is wider, by about 8% in lowercase text.
+Do both support the same languages?
Both cover Cyrillic, Latin, Central European, Vietnamese. Only Cactus Classical Serif has Chinese Traditional. Only Source Serif 4 has Cyrillic Extended, Greek.
Ready to fix your PDF?
Free, in your browser, and it takes about a minute. No account needed.