Cutive Mono vs Roboto Mono
Their letters differ in shape and width even though overall text length is similar, so lines may break in different places.
Handgloves 2026
Handgloves 2026
| Cutive Mono | Roboto Mono | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monospace | Monospace |
| Weights | Regular | Thin, ExtraLight, Light, Regular, Medium, SemiBold, Bold |
| Italics | No | Yes |
| Variable font | No | Yes |
| Average lowercase width | 605.5 | 600.1 |
| Digits | tabular | tabular |
| Character sets | 2 | 6 |
| Licence | SIL Open Font License 1.1 | SIL Open Font License 1.1 |
Weights both families offer: Regular.
Choose a PDF
or drop it here
Private and secureNo sign upNo watermarkUp to 100 MB
More about each
Questions people ask
+Is Roboto Mono a good replacement for Cutive Mono?
Their letters differ in shape and width even though overall text length is similar, so lines may break in different places. Their mean width difference is 5.4 units per 1000 em (very close widths).
+Which is wider, Cutive Mono or Roboto Mono?
Cutive Mono is wider, by about 1% in lowercase text.
+Do both support the same languages?
Both cover Latin, Central European. Only Roboto Mono has Cyrillic, Cyrillic Extended, Greek, Vietnamese.
Ready to fix your PDF?
Free, in your browser, and it takes about a minute. No account needed.