Encode Sans Condensed vs GFS Neohellenic
GFS Neohellenic is about 8% narrower than Encode Sans Condensed in lowercase text, so a paragraph set in one will break lines differently in the other.
Handgloves 2026
Handgloves 2026
| Encode Sans Condensed | GFS Neohellenic | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Sans serif | Sans serif |
| Weights | Thin, ExtraLight, Light, Regular, Medium, SemiBold, Bold, ExtraBold, Black | Regular, Bold |
| Italics | No | Yes |
| Variable font | No | No |
| Average lowercase width | 430.7 | 396 |
| Digits | proportional | tabular |
| Character sets | 3 | 4 |
| Licence | SIL Open Font License 1.1 | SIL Open Font License 1.1 |
Weights both families offer: Regular, Bold.
Choose a PDF
or drop it here
Private and secureNo sign upNo watermarkUp to 100 MB
More about each
Questions people ask
+Is GFS Neohellenic a good replacement for Encode Sans Condensed?
GFS Neohellenic is about 8% narrower than Encode Sans Condensed in lowercase text, so a paragraph set in one will break lines differently in the other. Their mean width difference is 51.4 units per 1000 em (loosely similar widths).
+Which is wider, Encode Sans Condensed or GFS Neohellenic?
Encode Sans Condensed is wider, by about 8% in lowercase text.
+Do both support the same languages?
Both cover Latin, Vietnamese. Only Encode Sans Condensed has Central European. Only GFS Neohellenic has Greek, Greek Extended.
Ready to fix your PDF?
Free, in your browser, and it takes about a minute. No account needed.