Figtree vs TASA Orbiter
TASA Orbiter is about 3% wider than Figtree in lowercase text, so a paragraph set in one will break lines differently in the other.
Handgloves 2026
Handgloves 2026
| Figtree | TASA Orbiter | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Sans serif | Sans serif |
| Weights | Light, Regular, Medium, SemiBold, Bold, ExtraBold, Black | Regular, Medium, SemiBold, Bold, ExtraBold |
| Italics | Yes | No |
| Variable font | Yes | Yes |
| Average lowercase width | 507 | 522.3 |
| Digits | proportional | proportional |
| Character sets | 2 | 2 |
| Licence | SIL Open Font License 1.1 | SIL Open Font License 1.1 |
Weights both families offer: Regular, Medium, SemiBold, Bold, ExtraBold.
Choose a PDF
or drop it here
Private and secureNo sign upNo watermarkUp to 100 MB
More about each
Questions people ask
+Is TASA Orbiter a good replacement for Figtree?
TASA Orbiter is about 3% wider than Figtree in lowercase text, so a paragraph set in one will break lines differently in the other. Their mean width difference is 27 units per 1000 em (similar widths).
+Which is wider, Figtree or TASA Orbiter?
TASA Orbiter is wider, by about 3% in lowercase text.
+Do both support the same languages?
Both cover Latin, Central European.
Ready to fix your PDF?
Free, in your browser, and it takes about a minute. No account needed.