GFS Didot vs Tiro Devanagari Hindi
Tiro Devanagari Hindi is about 2% wider than GFS Didot in lowercase text, so a paragraph set in one will break lines differently in the other.
Handgloves 2026
Handgloves 2026
| GFS Didot | Tiro Devanagari Hindi | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Serif | Serif |
| Weights | Regular | Regular |
| Italics | No | Yes |
| Variable font | No | No |
| Average lowercase width | 504.6 | 512.4 |
| Digits | proportional | proportional |
| Character sets | 4 | 3 |
| Licence | SIL Open Font License 1.1 | SIL Open Font License 1.1 |
Weights both families offer: Regular.
Choose a PDF
or drop it here
Private and secureNo sign upNo watermarkUp to 100 MB
More about each
Questions people ask
+Is Tiro Devanagari Hindi a good replacement for GFS Didot?
Tiro Devanagari Hindi is about 2% wider than GFS Didot in lowercase text, so a paragraph set in one will break lines differently in the other. Their mean width difference is 41.5 units per 1000 em (loosely similar widths).
+Which is wider, GFS Didot or Tiro Devanagari Hindi?
Tiro Devanagari Hindi is wider, by about 2% in lowercase text.
+Do both support the same languages?
Both cover Latin. Only GFS Didot has Greek, Greek Extended, Vietnamese. Only Tiro Devanagari Hindi has Devanagari, Central European.
Ready to fix your PDF?
Free, in your browser, and it takes about a minute. No account needed.