Gloock vs Ovo
Ovo is about 6% narrower than Gloock in lowercase text, so a paragraph set in one will break lines differently in the other.
Handgloves 2026
Handgloves 2026
| Gloock | Ovo | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Serif | Serif |
| Weights | Regular | Regular |
| Italics | No | No |
| Variable font | No | No |
| Average lowercase width | 525.7 | 494.9 |
| Digits | proportional | proportional |
| Character sets | 3 | 1 |
| Licence | SIL Open Font License 1.1 | SIL Open Font License 1.1 |
Weights both families offer: Regular.
Choose a PDF
or drop it here
Private and secureNo sign upNo watermarkUp to 100 MB
More about each
Questions people ask
+Is Ovo a good replacement for Gloock?
Ovo is about 6% narrower than Gloock in lowercase text, so a paragraph set in one will break lines differently in the other. Their mean width difference is 43.4 units per 1000 em (loosely similar widths).
+Which is wider, Gloock or Ovo?
Gloock is wider, by about 6% in lowercase text.
+Do both support the same languages?
Both cover Latin. Only Gloock has Cyrillic Extended, Central European.
Ready to fix your PDF?
Free, in your browser, and it takes about a minute. No account needed.