Google Sans Code vs Hibur Mono
Text set in Google Sans Code takes almost exactly the same space in Hibur Mono. Swapping one for the other in a document keeps the same line breaks.
Handgloves 2026
Handgloves 2026
| Google Sans Code | Hibur Mono | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Monospace | Monospace |
| Weights | Light, Regular, Medium, SemiBold, Bold, ExtraBold | Regular |
| Italics | Yes | No |
| Variable font | Yes | No |
| Average lowercase width | 600 | 600 |
| Digits | tabular | tabular |
| Character sets | 11 | 3 |
| Licence | SIL Open Font License 1.1 | SIL Open Font License 1.1 |
Weights both families offer: Regular.
Choose a PDF
or drop it here
Private and secureNo sign upNo watermarkUp to 100 MB
More about each
Questions people ask
+Is Hibur Mono a good replacement for Google Sans Code?
Text set in Google Sans Code takes almost exactly the same space in Hibur Mono. Swapping one for the other in a document keeps the same line breaks. Their mean width difference is 0 units per 1000 em (identical letter widths).
+Which is wider, Google Sans Code or Hibur Mono?
They are the same width on average.
+Do both support the same languages?
Both cover Latin, Central European. Only Google Sans Code has Adlam, Canadian Aboriginal, Cherokee, Math symbols, Old Permic, Symbols, More symbols, Syriac, Vietnamese. Only Hibur Mono has Ethiopic.
Ready to fix your PDF?
Free, in your browser, and it takes about a minute. No account needed.