Hepta Slab vs Stoke
Stoke is about 2% wider than Hepta Slab in lowercase text, so a paragraph set in one will break lines differently in the other.
Handgloves 2026
Handgloves 2026
| Hepta Slab | Stoke | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Serif | Serif |
| Weights | Thin, ExtraLight, Light, Regular, Medium, SemiBold, Bold, ExtraBold, Black | Light, Regular |
| Italics | No | No |
| Variable font | Yes | No |
| Average lowercase width | 625.8 | 635.4 |
| Digits | proportional | proportional |
| Character sets | 3 | 2 |
| Licence | SIL Open Font License 1.1 | SIL Open Font License 1.1 |
Weights both families offer: Light, Regular.
Choose a PDF
or drop it here
Private and secureNo sign upNo watermarkUp to 100 MB
More about each
Questions people ask
+Is Stoke a good replacement for Hepta Slab?
Stoke is about 2% wider than Hepta Slab in lowercase text, so a paragraph set in one will break lines differently in the other. Their mean width difference is 43.6 units per 1000 em (loosely similar widths).
+Which is wider, Hepta Slab or Stoke?
Stoke is wider, by about 2% in lowercase text.
+Do both support the same languages?
Both cover Latin, Central European. Only Hepta Slab has Vietnamese.
Ready to fix your PDF?
Free, in your browser, and it takes about a minute. No account needed.