Kanchenjunga vs Recursive
Recursive is about 10% wider than Kanchenjunga in lowercase text, so a paragraph set in one will break lines differently in the other.
Handgloves 2026
Handgloves 2026
| Kanchenjunga | Recursive | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Sans serif | Sans serif |
| Weights | Regular, Medium, SemiBold, Bold | Light, Regular, Medium, SemiBold, Bold, ExtraBold, Black |
| Italics | No | No |
| Variable font | No | Yes |
| Average lowercase width | 514.2 | 563.5 |
| Digits | tabular | tabular |
| Character sets | 2 | 4 |
| Licence | SIL Open Font License 1.1 | SIL Open Font License 1.1 |
Weights both families offer: Regular, Medium, SemiBold, Bold.
Choose a PDF
or drop it here
Private and secureNo sign upNo watermarkUp to 100 MB
More about each
Questions people ask
+Is Recursive a good replacement for Kanchenjunga?
Recursive is about 10% wider than Kanchenjunga in lowercase text, so a paragraph set in one will break lines differently in the other. Their mean width difference is 39.5 units per 1000 em (loosely similar widths).
+Which is wider, Kanchenjunga or Recursive?
Recursive is wider, by about 10% in lowercase text.
+Do both support the same languages?
Both cover Latin. Only Kanchenjunga has Kirat Rai. Only Recursive has Cyrillic Extended, Central European, Vietnamese.
Ready to fix your PDF?
Free, in your browser, and it takes about a minute. No account needed.