Mukta vs Thasadith
Thasadith is about 5% narrower than Mukta in lowercase text, so a paragraph set in one will break lines differently in the other.
Handgloves 2026
Handgloves 2026
| Mukta | Thasadith | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Sans serif | Sans serif |
| Weights | ExtraLight, Light, Regular, Medium, SemiBold, Bold, ExtraBold | Regular, Bold |
| Italics | No | Yes |
| Variable font | No | No |
| Average lowercase width | 471.3 | 448.6 |
| Digits | proportional | proportional |
| Character sets | 3 | 4 |
| Licence | SIL Open Font License 1.1 | SIL Open Font License 1.1 |
Weights both families offer: Regular, Bold.
Choose a PDF
or drop it here
Private and secureNo sign upNo watermarkUp to 100 MB
More about each
Questions people ask
+Is Thasadith a good replacement for Mukta?
Thasadith is about 5% narrower than Mukta in lowercase text, so a paragraph set in one will break lines differently in the other. Their mean width difference is 28.1 units per 1000 em (similar widths).
+Which is wider, Mukta or Thasadith?
Mukta is wider, by about 5% in lowercase text.
+Do both support the same languages?
Both cover Latin, Central European. Only Mukta has Devanagari. Only Thasadith has Thai, Vietnamese.
Ready to fix your PDF?
Free, in your browser, and it takes about a minute. No account needed.