Preahvihear vs Red Hat Text
Red Hat Text is about 12% narrower than Preahvihear in lowercase text, so a paragraph set in one will break lines differently in the other.
Handgloves 2026
Handgloves 2026
| Preahvihear | Red Hat Text | |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Sans serif | Sans serif |
| Weights | Regular | Light, Regular, Medium, SemiBold, Bold |
| Italics | No | Yes |
| Variable font | No | Yes |
| Average lowercase width | 565.6 | 497.6 |
| Digits | proportional | proportional |
| Character sets | 2 | 2 |
| Licence | SIL Open Font License 1.1 | SIL Open Font License 1.1 |
Weights both families offer: Regular.
Choose a PDF
or drop it here
Private and secureNo sign upNo watermarkUp to 100 MB
More about each
Questions people ask
+Is Red Hat Text a good replacement for Preahvihear?
Red Hat Text is about 12% narrower than Preahvihear in lowercase text, so a paragraph set in one will break lines differently in the other. Their mean width difference is 43.6 units per 1000 em (loosely similar widths).
+Which is wider, Preahvihear or Red Hat Text?
Preahvihear is wider, by about 12% in lowercase text.
+Do both support the same languages?
Both cover Latin. Only Preahvihear has Khmer. Only Red Hat Text has Central European.
Ready to fix your PDF?
Free, in your browser, and it takes about a minute. No account needed.